It shouldnt give any until fixed
I see archers begging for it to be put ingame so they can **** balance due to using mc.
Make it wiz only
Because wizzes already have pseudo pro rings already isn't enough
hmm, odd comparison to make considering that's a bugged item that's actively being banned for anyone using it to be fixed.
I kinda have to agree, 30% extra hp on an archer isn't right. I dislike locking it only to wizards as a fix, though. So what if it gave a set amount of HP instead? That way the archers can get it too and because its not a % bonus it's not as Overpowered.
What is acting as a pseudo pro ring?
I've not seen a GM or Dev say that's it's bannable or that it's a bug/unintended. I do hope that is indeed the case though.hmm, odd comparison to make considering that's a bugged item that's actively being banned for anyone using it to be fixed.
I kinda have to agree, 30% extra hp on an archer isn't right. I dislike locking it only to wizards as a fix, though. So what if it gave a set amount of HP instead? That way the archers can get it too and because its not a % bonus it's not as Overpowered.
I've not seen a GM or Dev say that's it's bannable or that it's a bug/unintended. I do hope that is indeed the case though.
My point, although grumpily made is similar though, it's unfair to class lock a set unless you in turn offer another set for the other class
So use a bugged item, get banned just so you can **** balance up with an ill thought 5 string set for an archer.Because wizzes already have pseudo pro rings already isn't enough
It shouldnt give any until fixed
I see archers begging for it to be put ingame so they can **** balance due to using mc.
Make it wiz only
Word on the street is that Conspiracy have been abusing the red orchid set (it acts like a pro ring) to obtain rare books and items!
He said he would be punishing people who abused it.
Nothing about banning but that could well be the punishment.
