Prehistoric Shark.

Play Now

Atomicide

Golden Oldie
Golden Oldie
Jul 4, 2003
1,032
10
175
they live 42k meters beneath the sea, so can obviously withstand massive pressure. Hence, that shark has my seal of approval.
 

Peart

Dedicated Member
Dedicated Member
Apr 14, 2006
13
0
27
feet, actually.

You see the funny thing is that Atom's was just a little slip up, you corrected him and STILL were wrong. Idiot.
 

Far

tinmymouthpl0x
Staff member
Administrator
May 19, 2003
20,683
34
3,288
520
feet, actually.

You see the funny thing is that Atom's was just a little slip up, you corrected him and STILL were wrong. Idiot.

600 metres or more, actually.
 

Jesus LOL

Dedicated Member
Dedicated Member
Aug 1, 2006
230
0
42
Congradulations, I see you still enjoy your picture of the naked bably being assaulted by tenticles you ****ing paedophile.
Congratulations and baby

Sorry 2 correct you, just doing it before some dickhead does it in a ****y way :P

and have u been drinkin? =/
 

Atomicide

Golden Oldie
Golden Oldie
Jul 4, 2003
1,032
10
175
Congratulations and baby

Sorry 2 correct you, just doing it before some dickhead does it in a ****y way :P

and have u been drinkin? =/

Frankly, I don't care if some asshat comes and corrects my spelling. A couple of simple typo's is nothing compared to the usual retarded spelling that morons spout on here.

Also, I don't drink, I was tired and really couldn't be bothered to check and correct my spelling.

On the note of the depth the ******* shark living at 4.2k anything is a retarded statement, which is why I wrote 42k, because I assumed the "." was a mistake or something on the site I was reading. 4.2k = 4.2000, or 4.2 which is retarded. 4200 feet would be the actual correct term to use anyway, however im sure our paedophile friend already knew that.
 
Last edited:

Pure_Fusion

Dedicated Member
Dedicated Member
Dec 17, 2006
96
0
32
They should just send a submarine with some kind of device to catch more of these sharks.

Does anyone know if they published any information on the disection of this shark? Might some ..... but i find it interesting, what makes them able to survive the water pressure? etc ..
 

Atomicide

Golden Oldie
Golden Oldie
Jul 4, 2003
1,032
10
175
They should just send a submarine with some kind of device to catch more of these sharks.

Does anyone know if they published any information on the disection of this shark? Might some ..... but i find it interesting, what makes them able to survive the water pressure? etc ..

They can't, we're talking Japan here, any submarine that heads that way is going to end up fighting godzilla.

In all seriousness though its more than likely that the attempts to capture and keep one for study would leave it too stressed out, resulting in it dying after capture.

I do think they have some in captivity, as the story said "they are rarely seen alive in their natural habitat"
 

Pure_Fusion

Dedicated Member
Dedicated Member
Dec 17, 2006
96
0
32
They can't, we're talking Japan here, any submarine that heads that way is going to end up fighting godzilla.

In all seriousness though its more than likely that the attempts to capture and keep one for study would leave it too stressed out, resulting in it dying after capture.

I do think they have some in captivity, as the story said "they are rarely seen alive in their natural habitat"

True but with today's technology i'd say they would think of something to calm the thing down. It wouldent be just for this shark, just think of how many other type's of 'creatures' exist. Heh maybe godzilla is there :D. But im pretty sure submarines can go beyond 600m, not sure if any went but if anything it would be as exciting as sending a spaceship to the moon imo, only would cost like billions less and ofc this would produce some results as opose to us finding green aliens in flying spaceships that aparantly obduct us to steal our sperm and create crop circles to communicate with us ...