Unanswered questions

[chimera]

these are what support the conspiracy theorists.

This is a computer model of the plane impact on the Pentagon 9-11 Pay close attention to the width of the impact area.

Then look at the pictures on this page. Specifically at the size of the initial hole in the Pentagon.

Then look at the direction the plane came from and the angle it hit the Pentagon compared with the direction of the demolished areas of the pentagon.

I'm not supporting or otherwise a conspiracy but to be honest it just doesn't make logical sense to me.

 

[Peart]

It was all orchestrated by the space seals from neptune in close collaberation with the moon jews

 

[Toxick]

chimera welcome to 5 years later

 

[turboshandy]

i take it you watched it too sean some interesting things were on that proggy

 

[Blaminator]

Only fools believe this stuff.

 

[ipixel]

i usually hate reading anything conspirists write or watch anything they produce, they warp and twist everything to match what little demented idea they have floating around inside their delusional heads, some of the stuff they produce is very factual, but 99% of the time they take it OTT and destroy any credibility they have in their "research".

 

[urbanfox]

We all know it was the Jews.

 

[kud125]

here we go again....

 

[chimera]

Logically speaking a plane with wings that were aledgedly inside the pentagon in the positions given in the independent reconstruction (which did not support a conspiracy) would I think raise the question.....How the heck that happen when the hole was only 18ft wide, that's all I'm saying.

There are other questions raised too but not really answered.

I do believe that conspiracy theorists don't do themselves any favours picking up the 4000 jews thing and running with it and I tend to believe Flight 93 was brought down by the passengers attempting to retake the plane going wrong.... but where did the bulk of the plane go is a good question to be honest.

You're right Sam, very interesting and I am just curious if I missed some info and the answers to this sort of thing where given and I missed it somehow.

I do think we are not told everything because it's in the national interest, i.e people might feel totally unsafe because intelligence agencies "lose" a request to look into known terrorists entering the country. That was quite frankly incompitance by the people put in place to protect the country.

Those who don't question are saying they believe everything anyone says, especially those in power:

Clinton - I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

Bush - There is no doubt Sadam Hussain has stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction.

Reagan - We did not -- repeat -- did not trade weapons or anything else for hostages -- nor will we.

JFK - I have previously stated and I repeat now that the United States intends no military intervention in Cuba.

I could go on but basically only a fool believes everything they are told, regardless of where it comes from.

 

[Peart]

Clinton - I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

Well exactly. Bill Clinton couldnt get a blow job without the entire world knowing about it... you REALLY think that thousands of government operatives and experts could keep a secret of this size?

The hole was 18 feet wide. The body of a boeing 757 is about 12 feet wide. Too small my ass.

Since your posts are just regurgitated forms of that documentary on BBC2, then I'm sure you also saw the nice expert man telling you all about this, and just how "impossible" it really was.

 

[Blaminator]

words

I'm not even reading that because I know it's a bunch of crap

 

[Babyhack]

This is the news today
As its on the front page of most of the papers

OMG Britney Spears has no hair


9/11 was 5 years ago
There is nothing anyone can do about it
Next there will be a program saying that the wave that killed 100,000 + people was made by Mr Bush with a wave machine on the side of a sub and that hurricane Katrina was a planned attack by Iran

But for the Love of all that is
will someone PLEASE get Britney a wig

BH

 

[chimera]

You don't get me, the wings were aledgedly inside the pentagon in the approximate positions they should have been in, the hole was 18 feet accross (wing span of 757 124 ft 10"), my query is how can that happen? did the wings fold up like a birds and then unfold once inside the outer wall, which was unmarked by the wings or the engines (like putting a ship in a bottle perhaps) ??

This says it all, lot of unanswered questions some of which I laugh at as I can reasonably see the answers are obvious.

Release the CCTV footage if that shows exactly what happened and end the speculation I say.

More photos


I accept something like an aircraft hit the pentagon, I just can't see how it was an aircraft with the dimensions of a Boeing 757.

I agree there is nothing anyone can do about it, it doesn't mean you should never question things that are beyong your control. Other comments are just not worth looking at. I raised a reasonable query - how is it possible, if you can't be constructive don't post.

 

[Sawell]

If you take 4 and 5 and stick a point between it, it then makes 4.5?! Hold on though, because if you take that value and times it by the width of the hole (18) it makes 81! Now, if you subtract 81 from 747 (boing 747) you get 666.

This clearly indicates that this was the work of the devil. No further questions. Problem solved.

 

[Peart]

yes, it just happened to be an object that had pieces of 757 engine, 757 landing gear and 757 fuselage all over it. The wings were cut to ribbons upon impact, not standing a chance against the re-enforced concrete structure. You can see that from your own freaking links.

Debris:

And now lets take a look at some security footage

And if that isnt enough, lets take a look at the damage done compared to the size of a 747

And lets not forget that this isnt Tom and Jerry, solid objects dont leave precise outlines of themselves when they crash through walls.

Now, lets ask some witnesses what they think

Sean Boger, Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief - "I just looked up and I saw the big nose and the wings of the aircraft coming right at us and I just watched it hit the building," Air Traffic Controller and Pentagon tower chief Sean Boger said. "It exploded. I fell to the ground and covered my head. I could actually hear the metal going through the building." dcmilitary.com November 16, 2001

"Afework Hagos, a computer programmer, was on his way to work but stuck in a traffic jam near the Pentagon when the plane flew over. 'There was a huge screaming noise and I got out of the car as the plane came over. Everybody was running away in different directions. It was tilting its wings up and down like it was trying to balance. It hit some lampposts on the way in.'"
- "Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001

"We were the only people, we think, who saw it live," Dan Creed said. He and two colleagues from Oracle software were stopped in a car near the Naval Annex, next to the Pentagon, when they saw the plane dive down and level off. "It was no more than 30 feet off the ground, and it was screaming. It was just screaming. It was nothing more than a guided missile at that point," Creed said. "I can still see the plane. I can still see it right now. It's just the most frightening thing in the world, going full speed, going full throttle, its wheels up," - Ahwatukee Foothill News

"The only way you could tell that an aircraft was inside was that we saw pieces of the nose gear. The devastation was horrific. It was obvious that some of the victims we found had no time to react. The distance the firefighters had to travel down corridors to reach the fires was a problem. With only a good 25 minutes of air in their SCBA bottles, to save air they left off their face pieces as they walked and took in a lot of smoke," Captain Defina said. Captain Defina was the shift commander [of an aircraft rescue firefighters crew.] NFPA Journal November 1, 2001

Now, my one question. Why would the government put all this time into this conspiracy and use a missile or fighter jet or whatever to bomb the pentagon, and then say it was a 747? whats the point in that? Couldnt they just use a 747 to start with?

Infact, dont bother replying, you have nothing to say that will be of any value to me. It's been thourghly debunked. over and over again. clueless people can't grasp the size of the pentagon so make perspective errors. and it's all downhill from there.

mods lock this thread. leave the whackjobs to their fairytales and ghost stories.

 

[ipixel]

Sadly unless you have 5000 eyewitnesses with video recorders at a scene, alot of lonely arsefags will whip us up a nice conspiracy theory.

 

[Babyhack]

yes, it just happened to be an object that had pieces of 757 engine, 757 landing gear and 757 fuselage all over it. The wings were cut to ribbons upon impact, not standing a chance against the re-enforced concrete structure. You can see that from your own freaking links.

Debris:

And now lets take a look at some security footage

And if that isnt enough, lets take a look at the damage done compared to the size of a 747

And lets not forget that this isnt Tom and Jerry, solid objects dont leave precise outlines of themselves when they crash through walls.

Now, lets ask some witnesses what they think










Now, my one question. Why would the government put all this time into this conspiracy and use a missile or fighter jet or whatever to bomb the pentagon, and then say it was a 747? whats the point in that? Couldnt they just use a 747 to start with?

Infact, dont bother replying, you have nothing to say that will be of any value to me. It's been thourghly debunked. over and over again. clueless people can't grasp the size of the pentagon so make perspective errors. and it's all downhill from there.

mods lock this thread. leave the whackjobs to their fairytales and ghost stories.

I grant you the Post of the day award

People don't seem to understand that compared to the pentagon a 74/57 is very small
and also the fact that the pentagon is one hell of a reinforced building

BH

 

[Dataforce]

please people, let it go. we must get 4/5 of these posts each year, its getting boring. Its almost worth a new infraction category. "started a 9/11 thread"

 

[chimera]

Close or delete the thread, I foound the answer to my original question.

 

[anto]

Man diddn't go to the moon.