I replied to one of your posts, then you replied so I replied, I didn't reply to you on the other post, whereas you had to.
Right lets take it all the way back to Primary school here, seems we need to.
It goes, 1, 2, 3, and so on.
FIRST REPLY said:
Re: phone unlockin help
ME said:
Originally Posted by Wond View Post
So putting valuable items into loose pockets is not stupid ? Okay.
Do you want to know why it IS stupid ? Because you end up loosing them, like this poor bloke.
YOU said:
Accidents happen... Like goatsex said.
SECOND REPLY said:
Re: LOMCN Awards 2008
ME said:
Originally Posted by Wond View Post
Stop saying "INIT" all over these forums. Nobody is IN anything.
Init is short for isn't it.
YOU said:
So that's a poor statement
Now, before you go and say "That was another day" or "That was in another topic". Both of my replies to him have been in separate topics.
So lets go back to your logic. I've replied to TWO of his posts, meaning I NEED to reply to EVERYTHING he says. You've replied to two of my posts, meaning you NEED to reply to EVERYTHING I say. Now can I ask you why that is ? "Who gives a ****" you said to me. You clearly give a **** about what I say. Remember now, thats your logic though.. not mine.
JealY said:
And you're a spacker because you reply to someone, pretty much insulting them for the way they speak/type.
Spacker meaning Retard, Mong, Window Licker, Pleb, Twat, Spanner.. and so forth.
hellcaster said:
No, your little friend doesn't fall into that category what so ever. But I do, because I don't like how he speaks.
Again, loving your logic there pal.