His trademark is clear. It's class 09 which is online gaming. Technically as he owns the trademark for that classification he could challenge anything in that given class with the name. Of course he wouldn't challenge LOMCN etc as he'd lose the case and lose the registration, but it doesn't stop him shooting down new servers as they come should they use that wording. It's not really an issue, as he'd never actually get into a legal battle about it - but he can provide the documentation to ISPs and hosting companies and have them close the service (as they don't understand the circumstance).
As for the sole tradership (aside from the fact he can't spell sole), you can't really report someone and have anything happen, aside from getting the tax man involved... but that's only really an issue in terms of VAT and smaller taxes, which you don't even have to declare unless you turnover a certain amount per annum. I don't think he'd be turning over enough, and I don't think it would cause him much hassle regardless.
Thats all he has done is provided the class 09 trademark, he can challange it under the class 09. But then has a legal battle on his hands if he does, as his class 09 doesn't clearly state in what context or to what level.
Unlike DSUK, everything is under a class 09 with description of what is covered by the trademark. Which happens to cover any server files that are created under the PGRCN GNU as well. He's clearly playing with fire that he can't put out and will get seriously burn if he continues.
As for being a sole trader, he is clearly stating that it's a registered company in the UK. Unfortuantly its not and never has been, I don't think he even knows how to go about doing this in all honesty. But because he is claiming to be a registered company in the UK, he is effectiverly commiting fraud.
On another note, anyone got an email address that actually works for lapta. As tried every single one I can find and no luck, as getting bounce back from the revenge ones.
