Luck (Bugged)

[Guccci]

Right, so i saw the other thread which was made about luck 7 weapons.. This isnt the problem.

On every Mir2 server, to hit your maximum dc every hit you have to have luck + 9 in total (you character has luck 1 hidden)
This has always been attainable by getting your weapon to a maximum of luck 7, but then having to use a luck necklace or heaven armour to get the rest. I was actually pretty shocked to see the reaction on the other thread, the only class that will ever get a luck 7 weapon on this server are Assassins, personally i don't think lucking weapons needs to be changed.. It just needs to be changed back to how it should be, by having to wear a luck necklace and sacrificing top end DC to hit your max every hit.

 

[ChaseyLane]

+1 and amen to that

as meatloaf would say you took the words right outta my mouth :P

the luck system imo needs looking at

 

[Zed]

Couldn't agree more

 

[Raider]

Luck is fine.

/Xele

 

[ILovePie:D]

Right, so i saw the other thread which was made about luck 7 weapons.. This isnt the problem.

On every Mir2 server, to hit your maximum dc every hit you have to have luck + 9 in total (you character has luck 1 hidden)
This has always been attainable by getting your weapon to a maximum of luck 7, but then having to use a luck necklace or heaven armour to get the rest. I was actually pretty shocked to see the reaction on the other thread, the only class that will ever get a luck 7 weapon on this server are Assassins, personally i don't think lucking weapons needs to be changed.. It just needs to be changed back to how it should be, by having to wear a luck necklace and sacrificing top end DC to hit your max every hit.

Any class can make a luck 7 weapon, not just assassins.

 

[lancelot1]

Any class can make a luck 7 weapon, not just assassins.

^

It might be easier to get FateBlades to 7, but it's by no means easy.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

 

[Guccci]

There is a massive disadvantage, because of the stats which were made too the Fate Blades. Yes, it might not be easy.. But its ALOT easier than any other weapon. hence the reason there are 6-7 of these ingame.

 

[ILovePie:D]

There is a massive disadvantage, because of the stats which were made too the Fate Blades. Yes, it might not be easy.. But its ALOT easier than any other weapon. hence the reason there are 6-7 of these ingame.

What disadvantage? Why not luck yourself up a fate sword?

 

[Guccci]

This is all irrelevant of what im trying to get at. Lucking weapons is fine... You should need more than a luck 7 weapon to hit your max dc / mc every hit. Its the way its always been, so obviously its a bug.

 

[ILovePie:D]

The way I see it is, you can't make yourself a luck 7 weapon, and are jealous of the people who have them, so you try to make a way to lower them down. I didn't play SAMs ace server, but I'm told luck was the same on there, and isn't a bug. It was funny hearing you moan about luck straight after you got owned at DD.

 

[Raider]

This is all irrelevant of what im trying to get at. Lucking weapons is fine... You should need more than a luck 7 weapon to hit your max dc / mc every hit. Its the way its always been, so obviously its a bug.

Why is it a bug? They choose what % chance each luck gives, they happened to choose luck7 being 100%, think it was the same on Ace.

/Xele

 

[Zed]

It makes sense though, I am on no ones sides for these petty arguments and quarrels.

Luck 7 to me indicates a 70% chance to hit your max DC/MC whatever.
10% Natural Luck.
then 20% from other sources should be required?

 

[Guccci]

It makes sense though, I am on no ones sides for these petty arguments and quarrels.

Luck 7 to me indicates a 70% chance to hit your max DC/MC whatever.
10% Natural Luck.
then 20% from other sources should be required?

This.

 

[Rollcage]

Why is it a bug? They choose what % chance each luck gives, they happened to choose luck7 being 100%, think it was the same on Ace.

/Xele

it was.
the issue on ace with luck was that it was dc based, so wizards had it 100x easier than anyone else to get luck+7, this was adressed, so, as far as im concerned its fine

 

[Guccci]

This has nothing to do with the fact i cant get a luck'd weapon. Ive never tried, i sell my bene's.

I will just say 1 thing though, as soon as a warrior has luck 7 you will be agreeing with me lol.

 

[ILovePie:D]

This has nothing to do with the fact i cant get a luck'd weapon. Ive never tried, i sell my bene's.

I will just say 1 thing though, as soon as a warrior has luck 7 you will be agreeing with me lol.

Not really, any luck 7 weap hits like a freight train.

 

[Rollcage]

Not really, any luck 7 weap hits like a freight train.

not really, warr/sin/archer weapons get the greatest benefit from this, a luck +7 wiz/tao weapon is good, but its not the same as a luck+7 melee weapon.
even so, i think luck is nicely balanced.

 

[Scorpian]

It makes sense though, I am on no ones sides for these petty arguments and quarrels.

Luck 7 to me indicates a 70% chance to hit your max DC/MC whatever.
10% Natural Luck.
then 20% from other sources should be required?

It makes sense because you invented an imaginary 10% body luck? Why not invent a 30% body luck to make it make more sense? Make sense? .,.

 

[Jamie]

It makes sense because you invented an imaginary 10% body luck? Why not invent a 30% body luck to make it make more sense? Make sense? .,.

This,

there is no Natural/Base Luck...

 

[Zed]

It makes sense because you invented an imaginary 10% body luck? Why not invent a 30% body luck to make it make more sense? Make sense? .,.

**Gucci, not myself
I am an old timer of mir but havent played it in years and don't know anything behind it (I don't even know what bodyluck actually does!)
I was going off what he said if it was a 10% base body then you could get 100% from other means (not sure if you can get luck2 off a neck?)

since there is no 'base luck' it still makes sense for every +1 luck to indicate a 10% chance wouldn't it?