New sig (again :P)

Play Now

SkyDragon

.::Mario Ftw::.
Golden Oldie
Sep 10, 2004
1,251
0
123
West-Yorkshire :)
soz m8 still dont like it. like every1 says add a character.logo etc will make it look alot better.. or just make a new sig :P


edit: u just changedit. i like those images but they dont match the background at all m8. + take sonic vs shadow out. + ur font dont match ur pics either. those images would look cool on some nice background + font m8
 

IceCreams

LOMCN Veteran
Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
326
0
43
CR0.
do this and see what it looks like:

1)get rid of the 'Anto135' ,words and font
2) get rid of blue sonic
3) Put 'Anto135' in a font small (not the font you used, a proffesional lookin one) in the bottom right corner.

see what that looks like
 

anto135

Guest
I can never find good fonts =/.
 

Attachments

  • banner4.gif
    banner4.gif
    49.5 KB · Views: 35

Pyraine

Golden Oldie
Golden Oldie
Feb 22, 2004
1,002
1
175
Aggresion
they all look heavily tutorialised and the font being embossed, looks tacky

EDIT: i didn't see the last one, that one looks much better, but still looks 100% obviously tutorialised
 

IceCreams

LOMCN Veteran
Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
326
0
43
CR0.
See I told you it looks way better now. BUT THE FONT STILL SUCKS!!!

edit - bun that, just get a font that aint bubbly, blocky or irregular. Something that is constant. make it smaller still and make 'anto' all in caps.

:weightlif
 
Last edited:

Wond

Golden Oldie
Golden Oldie
Feb 24, 2004
1,858
85
235
IRELAND
Pyraine said:
but still looks 100% obviously tutorialised

Tut's are made by people. So somthing cant look obviously tutorialised because for all you know, He may have got that effect himself.
 

anto135

Guest
banner3copy2oh.gif

And now?
 

FUTURA

LOMCN Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,517
16
175
DXB
Pyraine said:
don't test my knowledge fool, i seen a tutorial that he used a long time ago

let me test your knowledge!

'Satan is self-contradictory and self-destructive' To what extent do you agree with this in relation to Books 1 and 2 of Milton's Paradise Lost?

Out of 30.

:gunman:
 

Pyraine

Golden Oldie
Golden Oldie
Feb 22, 2004
1,002
1
175
Aggresion
FUTURA said:
let me test your knowledge!

'Satan is self-contradictory and self-destructive' To what extent do you agree with this in relation to Books 1 and 2 of Milton's Paradise Lost?

Out of 30.

:gunman:

I've read book one before, but i never thought he seemed self contradictory or self destructive, just the enemy of the heavens, he was compared to a whirl wind and a flood right at the beginning, i suppose these are destructive properties, but not self destructive, i don't remember any points where he contradicted himself either, but then again i wasn't expecting to be asked a question on it so i didn't analyse it
 

IceCreams

LOMCN Veteran
Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
326
0
43
CR0.
Pyraine said:
I've read book one before, but i never thought he seemed self contradictory or self destructive, just the enemy of the heavens, he was compared to a whirl wind and a flood right at the beginning, i suppose these are destructive properties, but not self destructive, i don't remember any points where he contradicted himself either, but then again i wasn't expecting to be asked a question on it so i didn't analyse it
Sort of, but no. He is self-contradictory in the sense that he rebelled in order to promote equality, i.e. he viewed God as a tyrant (Which is why Blake implied Milton was of the devils party without knowing it, duh), and then became superior to his fellow rebel-angels. Self-destructive in the sense that he knows God is Almighty therefore attack and war is suicide.

B+ for effort tho.
 

Pyraine

Golden Oldie
Golden Oldie
Feb 22, 2004
1,002
1
175
Aggresion
Aurus said:
Religious hoes.

being a hoe, isn't religious, in fact it's the opposite, prostitution is a vice (i think) so don't contradict yourself in future, it indicates an extreme lack of intelligence :)