New skills- but not too serious
- Thread starter bayya
- Start date
lol
thanks for all that. Didnt think anyone would take it serious. Wish I thought of blind. Shitting all over ppl sounds smelly. It was hokus so maybe he meant farts which might be smellier
thanks for all that. Didnt think anyone would take it serious. Wish I thought of blind. Shitting all over ppl sounds smelly. It was hokus so maybe he meant farts which might be smellier
- Feb 13, 2014
- 1,403
- 236
- 125
You mock people for spellings and 'punkchewayshun' look how you spelt capital...CAPITOL.
Banter lvl 0
Wnitsers>seyluncer
Your name doesn't deserve a 'capitol S'
- Apr 22, 2003
- 2,260
- 15
- 225
Was just about to say, you've quoted the wrong person you moron.
Shaun noticed your idiocy first though
x
Shaun noticed your idiocy first though
x
- Feb 13, 2014
- 1,403
- 236
- 125
Look at orig post, Silencer edited it.
Lap it up boy
Unless you quoted from another thread ofc ;p
- Apr 22, 2003
- 2,260
- 15
- 225
I didn't edit the quote, perhaps I edited my post from InsaneBanter to InsaneBanter Level 3.
Which includes no errors.
I think you've embarrassed yourself enough and should stop digging.
Which includes no errors.
I think you've embarrassed yourself enough and should stop digging.
- Feb 13, 2014
- 1,403
- 236
- 125
- Feb 13, 2014
- 1,403
- 236
- 125
Piggy back skill that is by far the smartest thing anybody has ever said ever on this forum!!
Didn't see his post on page 1, assumption is the mother of all **** ups.
You can have your 'capitol' S back, you earnt it
You have taken this defeat gracefully.
Well done.
P.S
"In modern-day usage the only accepted spelling is earned in all forms of English, even if you say it as "earnt". For Americans, accustomed to learned, smelled and dreamed as their only options, this little conundrum is never a problem.
There is conflicting advice on the origin of 'earnt'. Some internet sources state that it is an archaic (out of date/use) form of earned. They will point out that Charles Dickens used it in 1884, yet unlike learnt, dreamt and smelt, 'earnt' does not feature in the OED as a variant."
Last edited:
- Feb 13, 2014
- 1,403
- 236
- 125
I was enjoying this thread, try not to ruin it folks, gave me a few good chuckles.
Blind & Anti-luck seem like very neat ideas, homing in on the anti-luck might be a bit of a twat to do, but if i'm right when luck goes below 0 it goes to curse meaning higher chance of hitting lowest damage available? which potentially could be extremely powerful and might actually help against the whole "spam all the damage" kits out there, might have to introduce resistances to it etc.
Blind effecting wizards, see I personally hate ff etc, i miss the days of icestorm being awesome. But I can easily see complaints straight away "omg this assasin was next to me and my FF missed" etc. I'm actually not sure i'd give these spells to taoists, while they're the debuff class / support class. I think this might give them a bit TOO much. Might want to look at introducing it into the monk class? If it doesn't work out atleast you've got the code and can shift it to a different class for testing.
/Czelda
Blind & Anti-luck seem like very neat ideas, homing in on the anti-luck might be a bit of a twat to do, but if i'm right when luck goes below 0 it goes to curse meaning higher chance of hitting lowest damage available? which potentially could be extremely powerful and might actually help against the whole "spam all the damage" kits out there, might have to introduce resistances to it etc.
Blind effecting wizards, see I personally hate ff etc, i miss the days of icestorm being awesome. But I can easily see complaints straight away "omg this assasin was next to me and my FF missed" etc. I'm actually not sure i'd give these spells to taoists, while they're the debuff class / support class. I think this might give them a bit TOO much. Might want to look at introducing it into the monk class? If it doesn't work out atleast you've got the code and can shift it to a different class for testing.
/Czelda