Should runes be 'un-slottable'

[Guccci]

Personally I think you should be to unslot the runes in items, just wondered what other people thought? I would have posted a poll, but have no idea how to do it

 

[superscampi]

Na imo would make it too easy and bring down the value of slotted items

 

[Guccci]

If anything id say it would bump the price up.. As the slotted items could be used by all classes

 

[Freestyler]

Assuming that the rune is destroyed it wouldn't be a bad implementation.

 

[Shane/Banshee]

Yes as long as existing rune is destroyed.

 

[TheDayIDie]

Yes with disadvantages -
e.g. it costs a lot of money and if you have a 3slot item and wish to unslot it will unslot all of them and not just 1 in the process of having 50% chance of breaking the rune(s) and (maybe) a 15-25% chance of breaking the item.

Atleast then if they bloody up the drops in the revamp of drop files items will not be so common - considering gems aren't ingame yet there is nothing filtering out the items.

 

[The NightAngel]

Slot over the top (destroying previous) i agree with. Removable no

 

[terriblen]

As there is 0 chance of breaking the slotted item or the rune then No.
IF when you try toreplace or remove a rune there is the chance that both are destroyed then maybe but I would say no.
Gucci slotted items can be used by all classes anyway. If people are daft enough to put runes on before selling or cant work out which runes to put on to get the best sale price then tough.

 

[Zed]

It would need consequence, possibly cost you 25/30k to destroy a rune in a slot (with a rune hammer - essentials sells them) or something, it should be costly =]

 

[Turrican]

There are plans to add support for this, (removal with breakage) possibly it could be something we add to crafting.

although its currently on the back burner, while we focus on aspects of 2.0