Spamtastic.
- Thread starter Atomicide
- Start date
02goswej said:
Actually the thread is here for recruitment to another forum for spam...
And, besides being wrong on that point, when did a thread title ever circumvent the rules?
Yes, That's favourtism, I can't see anywhere in there that's not.Stonehelm said:
It's just like saying,
"We at LOMCN like futura and don't like Raz0rfang, so therefore we will not warn futura and ban Raz0rfang."
Anyway, forget about it now, it's the past.
Only problem with most of the GoT members going to atomicide.com is that they'll get bored and go back here because they've got no-one to flame.
If atom was admin of here it would be fun.
If atom was admin of here it would be fun.
- Jul 4, 2003
- 1,032
- 10
- 175
urbanfox said:
Actually that post is entirely unedited, and your a damn right liar on that matter. If your sure that the post is edited, then i dare you to put your prized mod position up against the claim, and ill glady hand access of my account to any administrator so they can check.
The crap you spouted at me on MSN was that i double posted, fair call except the post is almost 20 hours later for gods sake. Ive come back and made a real effort not to wind people up etc, so you ban for for a double post, then lie and tell everyone on here its becuase ive edited.
Now if your going to warn me for bumping a thread with a post made 20 hours later, and whose timing would have made it the next day as well, then thats just rediculous. Bear in mind these are the only two possibilities for my ban, and i can disprove the first one easily.
- Jul 4, 2003
- 1,032
- 10
- 175
-Raz0rfang- said:
Ive been supermod and admin here, infact ive been supermod 7 times, and admined once, and co-admined (second level admin) once. The only reason your complaining is becuase i didnt give you a mod position on Atomicide.com and you didnt like being flamed by other members.
Atomicide said:
Actually I made a sincere mistake. I havn't wanred anyone for double posting in a long time so I naturally thought it was an abuse or offensive warning and that you must have edited it because I wouldn't have given an offensive or abuse warning for that particular content.
After checking I realised it was a double post/spam warning so I apologize for the confusion.
Also, there would be no way to check if it was edited or not if we had possession of your account vs. our accounts.
I didn't ban you, I warned you, and it was because you already had 30+ warning points that you were automatically banned by the system. Like I said, it was a sincere mistake, I apologize for the confusion that it was presumed to be an abuse/offensive warning.
Like I said, I didn't ban you, I warned you, if you got banned then that's your fault for previously racking up the warnings points. And yes, you double posted in 24 hours. Let's not forget what you told me about the thread being at the 'bottom of the page' and you just wanted to bump it... all within 20 hours.... yea.... I don't think so?
Also, you shouldn't be surprised that I blocked you on MSN. I didn't curse or get pissed at all and answered all your questions, yet you felt the need to go ballistic and bring 9/11 into it for whatever reason, well MSN isn't your right, it's a privledge, and I can block anyone I please.
Last edited:
- Jul 4, 2003
- 1,032
- 10
- 175
-Raz0rfang- said:
Thats not the sort of rule i would put forward here, its not a forum thats mean tto be entirely rule-less as it has a different objective.
urbanfox said:
I said it was near the bottom of the page, i dont see whats so hard to comprehend about it, i mean your the one that warned me for the double post, and it was almost 20 hours later.... threads move down if they arent posted in, and if its been 20 hours since the last post, then its obviously going to move down.
I dont care you've blocked me on MSN, infact im suprised you unblocked me, my only guess is you were hoping to incite an arguement so you could re-block me.
Finally, you say "it was a genuine mistake becuase you havent warned anybody for double posting in a long time" how odd that im the first such person to be warned after this long time. Im sure in the big scheme of things the post being made four hours early wouldnt have mattered that much. Also i reveiwed the rules and theres no rule that states how long you have to wait before making a second post, and you cant claim it was spamming because ive in no way attempted to spam OR cuase trouble since my last ban, yet you seem desperate to ban me anyway, because lets face it, out of all the stupid warnings youve given me this one exceeds them by far.
urbanfox said:
You constantly feel the need to pick fights with me, i dont know what the underlying reason before was and you denied the fact you had a grudge against me. Despite all the warns/bans you gave me i tried to keep my cool, and keep the flames mild, which most will tell you isnt my normal style, but warnings for an avatar that was one of the least offensive ive made, and that made people laugh when i explained i was warned for them was the final straw, at which point i decided if you wanted to get into a grudge match with me, i may as well give you a valid reason.
From now on i jsut wont give you the satisfaction, ill just let you get on with your job, and ill post as i please, i wont break rules and eventually you will pick a miniscule reason to ban me yet again, with the final outcome of the situation being everyone realising i am right and you do have a problem with me.
Last edited:
Atomicide said:
If you rate my "grudge" against people in corelation with the amount of warnings I give then I assure you that you're at the bottom of the totem poll lol.
I didn't unblock you, I thought the second msn I got was from a different address
The bottom line is I don't have a grudge against you. I warn fairly and equally.