Things To Do
- Thread starter bestbet
- Start date
bwahahaha, get with the programme you weirdos. That 9/11 shit has been debunked to oblivion already. And this 'new world order' business just makes you look insane. Time to stop being paranoid assholes and leave the house once in a while.
And stop getting all your news from youtube you sad fucks.
And stop getting all your news from youtube you sad fucks.
just remembered a few things id like to do, paaa my driving test and get a car with atleast a 2.0 in it.
going on parents name, cba to drive a lil ****e car.
my m8 the other day bought his 2nd car, a T5 1998 2.3 230BHP volvo s70 pays 130 a month on his dad name he also payed a similar price on his 2.0 155 alfa.
my m8 the other day bought his 2nd car, a T5 1998 2.3 230BHP volvo s70 pays 130 a month on his dad name he also payed a similar price on his 2.0 155 alfa.
- Mar 5, 2005
- 1,085
- 2
- 125
debunked? I dont think so, Allot of evidence to clearly indicate that 9/11 was an inside job, could have been for
- access to iraq
- gold under towers
- brainwashing community
but you sir, are a longhaired hippy, go take your narrowminded brain to another country like france.
2.0 in the first 2 years of driving = nono, you will end up dead.. 1.6 MAX.
yeh if i was to go for 1.6 would have to be something like a honda accord, civic, avensis, not sure if they do a 1.6 avensis though.
but ive been looking at 2.0 chrysler pt cruisers, just about in my price budget, not too fast but a very nice car, and everything is standard on them from alloys(some chrome) to air con.
but ive been looking at 2.0 chrysler pt cruisers, just about in my price budget, not too fast but a very nice car, and everything is standard on them from alloys(some chrome) to air con.
You don't think so? That's because you get all your information from dramatic youtube videos and fellow nutcases. Duh. Research some opposing arguments, or your opinion is totally worthless.
Here I'll even make it easy for you:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
I'm serious, nobody still believes this 9/11 shit. Let it go already. It's over. The whackjobs lost.
P.S. I lol'd at "gold under the towers". I can only assume you threw that in there for some kind of comic relief, because it is seriously the stupidest thing I have ever read.
lols Vana you need to open to your third eye and begin to uderstand things more. your seeing the world 2d atm .
golfs are too common, i like cars unigue and to be able to do new stuff to them if you know what i mean.
Drat! Busted by the NY times! And doing billions of dollars of damage to steal a few hundred million's worth of gold must have seemed so worth it to a government that's worth trillions.
And I bet you didn't even look at the link I posted. *sigh*.
lol
firstly avensis is a toyota not a honda....
and wtf a chrysler pt cruiser?!?! r u kidding me? not only is it a chrysler but it looks like a fkin hod rod mixed with a ppl carrier.
and 1.6 Golfs are ok but bigger engine on them is more suitable.
It was deffinatly an inside job, try searching loose change on youtube and sit watching that for an hour and abit and i bet your convinced.
And i hate the fact that hardly anybody knows the 9/11 is like 911 (Their emergency number)
/Head
Last edited:
I have a few:
- I'm glad to see that America's news readers are so well informed on top secret plans.
- I love how all the primary sources are simply other conspiracy sites.
- I think the painfully slow rate at which the text scrolls is testament to the the vanishingly low intelligence of the average nutjob who would watch these videos.
- I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with standardisation, nor do I think it is in any way indicative of plans for a global government. In case you didn't realise, we are in a thing called the "E.U."...
- Retired and geriatric Rear Admirals whose names only come up on conspiracy sites have no authority or inside information on America's foreign policy, and it is almost hilariously dire that they put a quote from such a person in there.
- Repeating the same piece of archive footage 40 times is not a convincing method of conveying information.
How does it actually feel to watch these videos and read these sites and believe absolutely everything that's in them? Do you just agree with these nutcases automatically without any critical thinking done on your half?
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
Jackass. Get with the times.
Mate the evidence that they give on that video is very persuading, and what's to say you should believe everything you read nowadays? you never knew who set this page up, and why they did it..
/Head
P.S. Why so touchy on the subject?