if there ever was a nuclear strike on any country the ppl in the direct blast zone will be the lucky ones as they will be vaporized and wont have to deal with the radiation poison also wouldnt there be a EMP's set off with the explosions which will fk up all electrical appliances within the blast zone
Irans Nuclear Station
- Thread starter MegaSticks
- Start date
nuke days will come....belive me....amrica will be the `st and they will response back.....awww and then bye bye lomcn ... mir...
Ripman said:
Actually im not so sure americas demise will kill all the internet or MIR/LOMCN (altho i aint done a traceroute). Many countries including the UK have exchanges to keep their local traffic... local. Even the DNS system should be fine with the lack of root DNS servers, as long as most other local DNS servers don't falter (altho updating would be a problem).
/Leo
![¤]´)÷¤--§îr Äürøñ--¤÷(`[¤](/forum/data/avatars/m/0/64.jpg?1550430717){kind=avatar}
LeoCrasher said:
Actually, most UK ISPs route all their traffic through the USA anyway. It's why even on broadband you get > 100ms pings for most websites, while a select few give you ~ 30ms.
America will not fire nukes! for gods sake, im sick of these ''**** the government even though i have no idea what im talking about'' bandwagons. Would you be able to do a better job? They're not ****ing stupid, they didnt get to their positions for no reason. Why would they launch a nuke? They know what would happen.
¤]´)÷¤--§îr Äürøñ--¤÷(`[¤ said:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/12/16/linx_traffic_tops_20gbps/
https://www.linx.net/www_public/press_events/press_releases/pr_archive/pr081
With LINX handling 96% of UK traffic, I doubt your claim of 'most'. However there could be some relation in "Internal routes within the UK account for only 4.4 per cent of the connections".
Bad configuration/routing?
/Leo
LeoCrasher said:
Actually, it's just down to ISPs. Most ISPs wind up routing their traffic through to the US' servers. See my tracert to www.lomcn.co.uk below, and you'll understand :P
While LINX handle the traffic BETWEEN the ISPs, the second quote highlights my point. Most traffic leaves the UK, and then re-enters it.
Code:
D:\Documents and Settings\Tom>tracert www.lomcn.co.uk
Tracing route to lomcn.co.uk [64.246.16.69]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 19 ms 18 ms 16 ms 217.47.19.250
3 16 ms 16 ms 21 ms 217.47.19.161
4 18 ms 17 ms 18 ms 217.41.176.13
5 20 ms 18 ms 17 ms 217.41.176.65
6 20 ms 19 ms 18 ms 217.41.176.114
7 18 ms 18 ms 17 ms 217.41.176.58
8 16 ms 41 ms 19 ms 217.47.110.113
9 24 ms 27 ms 20 ms 217.32.171.209
10 20 ms 25 ms 23 ms core1-pos5-0.birmingham.ukcore.bt.net [194.74.16
.205]
11 24 ms 22 ms 24 ms core1-pos13-2.reading.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.196.10
6]
12 26 ms 26 ms 25 ms core1-pos7-4.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [195.99.125.33
]
13 26 ms 27 ms 27 ms core1-pos4-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [194.74.65.
113]
14 25 ms 26 ms 26 ms core2-gig10-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [195.99.12
5.154]
15 27 ms 26 ms 25 ms ge9-1.mpr2.lhr1.uk.above.net [208.185.156.217]
16 26 ms 25 ms 30 ms so-4-1-0.cr2.lhr3.uk.above.net [208.185.156.2]
17 127 ms 142 ms 180 ms so-7-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.above.net [64.125.31.182]
18 133 ms 138 ms 132 ms so-1-0-0.mpr2.iad1.us.above.net [64.125.28.65]
19 140 ms 135 ms 134 ms so-1-0-0.cr2.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.28.129]
20 135 ms 134 ms 132 ms so-0-0-0.cr1.dca2.us.above.net [64.125.29.121]
21 205 ms 144 ms 143 ms so-6-0-0.mpr2.atl6.us.above.net [64.125.27.62]
22 145 ms 145 ms 151 ms so-0-0-0.mpr1.atl6.us.above.net [64.125.27.49]
23 157 ms 156 ms 158 ms so-4-0-0.mpr2.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.29.70]
24 149 ms 174 ms * 216.200.251.53.ev1.net [216.200.251.53]
25 172 ms 167 ms 168 ms ivhou-207-218-245-29.ev1.net [207.218.245.29]
26 153 ms 149 ms 152 ms ivhou-207-218-245-124.ev1.net [207.218.245.124]
27 154 ms 153 ms 153 ms server1.data-host.co.uk [64.246.16.69]
Trace complete.Then I suggest you reread your traceroute, as the one for LOMCN (datahost) is US server. As all it tells me is that your connection routes to LOMCN in the US, which is correct.
LINX is not always easily identifyable as a hop;
https://www.linx.net/www_public/our_members/
Nevertheless here is my tracert for the UK server bbc.co.uk;
/Leo
LINX is not always easily identifyable as a hop;
https://www.linx.net/www_public/our_members/
Nevertheless here is my tracert for the UK server bbc.co.uk;
Code:
Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.131]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms rei02.mshome.net [192.168.0.1]
2 35 ms 36 ms 37 ms rdsl-lond-uk02.nw.mediaways.net [62.55.96.197]
3 38 ms 33 ms 34 ms rmwc-lond-uk02-gigaet-6-1.nw.mediaways.net [62.55.96.9]
4 42 ms 39 ms 39 ms 213.130.138.33
5 41 ms 35 ms 34 ms [color=blue]bbc-gw1-linx.prt0.rbsov.bbc.co.uk [195.66.226.194][/color]
6 32 ms 33 ms 38 ms 212.58.238.149
7 36 ms 33 ms 35 ms rdirwww-vip.thdo.bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.131]
Trace complete./Leo
LeoCrasher said:
That's because the BBC fits into that lovely 4.4% fully internal traffic.
I would provide an example of the UK->USA-> UK flow, except all my tracert's are ending prematurely all of a sudden :P
- Jul 4, 2003
- 1,032
- 10
- 175
It would take a serious manic, to fire a nuke, even a team of maniacs.
Firstly, firing a nuke against anyone, would ensure you would lose becuase an attack of that magnatude with so many other countries equiped with the same firepower would effectively ensure the end of your country.
Countries like nukes becuase they are a show of military strength and prowess, and provide protection against other nukes that wont be fire. They are really only there for the "fear factor"
Would you open fire with cruise missiles on a country if you knew they could nuke you into oblivion? i think not.
As for a dictator saying fire a nuke at America, i bet many of the capable technitians wouldnt have the balls of steel to take so many lives, unless they were all seriously stupid and maniacal.
Firstly, firing a nuke against anyone, would ensure you would lose becuase an attack of that magnatude with so many other countries equiped with the same firepower would effectively ensure the end of your country.
Countries like nukes becuase they are a show of military strength and prowess, and provide protection against other nukes that wont be fire. They are really only there for the "fear factor"
Would you open fire with cruise missiles on a country if you knew they could nuke you into oblivion? i think not.
As for a dictator saying fire a nuke at America, i bet many of the capable technitians wouldnt have the balls of steel to take so many lives, unless they were all seriously stupid and maniacal.
Atomicide said:
No. Instead, you give your nuke to state-sponsored terrorists. These individuals are not acting on behalf of the state, and so there is no 'legal' basis for war.
That is the single biggest threat to peace. Crazy middle-eastern nations KNOW NATO could quite easily wipe them from the face of this planet, but know they can avoid this by blaming it on 'Terrorists'.
Future won't be Nuclear War.. It will be laz0r warz.. Which will actually be satellite wars which in end.. The country with the most technological and furthest satellite from earth will be rulers!
no but, urban if you read what he said properly, you'll see he put the bit about being the most technologically advanced in bold, and replied with 'japan'
and with japan being the most technologically advanced, it makes perfect sense
and with japan being the most technologically advanced, it makes perfect sense
Pyraine said:
Technologically advanced in what area? Back from the ban I see, good behavior don't forget
