I actually think that this is going to do more harm than good to the Mir community. It makes it look like there is even less in the community.
I actually think that this is going to do more harm than good to the Mir community. It makes it look like there is even less in the community.
I don't think its about greed. I wouldn't call holding back a fiver greedy. I think it is more to do with the justification of paying a fiver.But a fiver a month really isn't alot of money , people are just being greedy not paying it lol
Surely you would want to support this forum/community....
Even the low count servers get donations, ive played low count servers and chucked a bit of money their way, so i cant comprehend why u wouldnt put back into the community
Each to their own though i guess?
There are other ways to support the community, I guess some won't pay due to already running at a loss, not making anything or as you say, greedy.
I don't think its about greed. I wouldn't call holding back a fiver greedy. I think it is more to do with the justification of paying a fiver.
I know its about supporting the community more than anything. But some people will be thinking that they gain now advantage in paying to display a number. Especially if its a low number. Some servers with a low count might benefit more by not paying and displaying.
I am trying to see it from a different perspective based on the low turnout.
Explain this to some one whos running a cash cow
Cash cow u say?
Yet i've paid my fiver, bought banners, and donated a fiver, going to also be putting 20£ into lomcn to buy more banner space v soon.
Your cheap arse hasnt even bought a banner, nor paid the fiver for his usercount to be listed. You just take take take from these forums, without putting one thing back, even darkside server paid its fiver!
PS : Just donated another 8£ to lomcn Just coz i can zed
Such as...This is fine for servers that take donations but what about servers that sell nothing? The operators already pay to host the files now they need to pay to show their usercount? Doesn't seem fair to me.
This is fine for servers that take donations but what about servers that sell nothing? The operators already pay to host the files now they need to pay to show their usercount? Doesn't seem fair to me.
Not the justification of paying a fiver. The cost is irrelivant. Its more of the justification of showing their user count. If they had any inclide of supporting LOMCN they would have already done so already via the donation system.The justification of paying a fiver? Compared to what they make from our free files and open sources? Looooooooooooooooooooooooool.
Nothing in this world is free, if you want that bit extra you have to pay. I don't see no issue with it, when you look back through posts like whys my server showing ? in the past, they was interested in their UC showing then, so why not now?Not the justification of paying a fiver. The cost is irrelivant. Its more of the justification of showing their user count. If they had any inclide of supporting LOMCN they would have already done so already via the donation system.
If they want to code their own signatures yes. But if you mean the ones we provide then no, it's all linked to the same dBNobodies stopping people from displaying their user count in their signatures I don’t think..
You can even embed it in your threads/posts.
Not sure if it could be classed as a loophole?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If they want to code their own signatures yes. But if you mean the ones we provide then no, it's all linked to the same dB
For servers that have ultra low usercounts then having a ? displayed instead is probably preferable anyway.
Sent from my phone using Tapatalk