evolution dictates survival of the fittest.QUOTE]
It does, and this is where things get complicated becuase bird flu doesnt follow that principle. This isnt anything that gets big on the news but some people discuss it. Bird flu is more likely to kill a healthy teenager/adult than it is to kill a 65+ pensioner with lung problems.
Thats not survival of the fittest. Personally advances in medicine are what made bird flu and other pandemics possible because we develop no natural immunity to anything anymore.
Bird flu really wreaks havoc on your lungs, and breaks them down making them weaker. Someone like me with asthma has a better chance than someone without because:
1. Steriod inhalers increase the rate at which my lungs can regenerate themsevles, and your lungs can regenerate pretty well on their own anyway.
2. ive had a flu jab every year since i was 14. Which means the merged strain that can pass from human to human will meet a fair amount of resistance in my body.
Stuff to remember :- although people have died from bird-flu theres been no actual recording of it passing from one person to another.
Your not gonna catch bird-flu from a random bird, unless you go out specifically to poke a dead bird or possible lick its lungs, then your 90% safe.
If bird-flu does hit en mass in the south of england, then it was nice knowing some of you since my girlfriends garden (the house where im staying) has 2 avaries with 200 birds between them

.