Warriors, Rage
- Thread starter Turrican
- Start date
you say asking the people who have played mir for over 5-8 years is a bad thing ?? a bad thing is picking random people to test your game....... Look at path of exile, if it was not for people like Kripparrian and others pushing what can and cant be done, it would still be buggy as hell and thats what u need when testing things. You either go open beta with a wipe for a month or u hand pick 10 people who know the game inside out.
If rage works right it should be a % based thing, At level 22 u can get what 40 dc with basic kit. lets say rage gives u 10% at level one thats only a +4 dc rise hardly game braking at such low level now is it ??
Why not have level 1 at 22 with a 10% boost, level 2 at 33 with 15% boost and then level 3 at 40 with 20 % boost.
No a bad thing is asking people to balance a game which you have changed the mechanics on, introduced new classes and only had a handful of people testing,
- Nov 7, 2007
- 3,881
- 186
- 280
You don't lower Rage to lvl20 because Assassin has Haste (Like Normal), i don't see any logic in that all and warriors not being viable at lower levels? news to me.
You need to stop trying to change the basic's of Mir because it will only be complained about later on.
Rage at level 20 isn't a good idea, i won't be playing so my opinion is unbiased towards any class but i did play Ace and if i had Rage at such a low level then it would of effected leveling more then you know it, not to mention pvp.
You need to stop trying to change the basic's of Mir because it will only be complained about later on.
Rage at level 20 isn't a good idea, i won't be playing so my opinion is unbiased towards any class but i did play Ace and if i had Rage at such a low level then it would of effected leveling more then you know it, not to mention pvp.
- Mar 23, 2010
- 47
- 0
- 33
If its just a small boost to wars at the lower levels - you could look at slightly increasing the DC on some of the weapons used by wars in the lower levels...Martial Swords, Power Axe, Puri, Gaxe, Dsword etc.
Not game changing and will help slightly.
Not game changing and will help slightly.
- Jun 8, 2012
- 1,041
- 41
- 135
Why help / change items to help a class? Will GM's help sins @ late game when they have the hp of a wizz only w/o the magicshield and get 2-3 hited by warrs?
- Mar 23, 2010
- 47
- 0
- 33
merely offering a suggestion to a thread created by one of the GM's who states the class needs a boost. If you feel you know better, i suggest you make your point clear before they implement a change and wars become OP!
Considering Some warriors did not even take slaying(can interrupt tdb, even if it doesn't once you have tdb it is almost useless apart from the small amount of acc). Make this skill give you a passive 2-2dc,3-3,dc,5-5dc,7-7dc and the 3ACC and it will give the same small early game boost and you can keep rage for later on.
Keep Rage rare imo.
Make TDB lvls a little different. Maybe 20, 26, 32 to give a more balanced skill progression:
lvl 20 - TDB lvl1
lvl 26 - TDB lvl2
lvl 30 - Dash
lvl 32 - TDB lvl 3
lvl 35 - FS lvl 1
lvl 37 - FS lvl 2
lvl 40 - FS lvl 3
Only issue may be mana usage?
Make TDB lvls a little different. Maybe 20, 26, 32 to give a more balanced skill progression:
lvl 20 - TDB lvl1
lvl 26 - TDB lvl2
lvl 30 - Dash
lvl 32 - TDB lvl 3
lvl 35 - FS lvl 1
lvl 37 - FS lvl 2
lvl 40 - FS lvl 3
Only issue may be mana usage?
new skills are what we want not skill level re-arranging. and TBH rage is not the skill we would LOVE to see be lowered in level as it only becomes effective with high levels of DC.
give us something with splash damage instead of halfmoon. im sure there are new skills that do a line of damage without requirements like thrust (needs 2 mobs in a row).
or even something that makes the character jump.
give us something with splash damage instead of halfmoon. im sure there are new skills that do a line of damage without requirements like thrust (needs 2 mobs in a row).
or even something that makes the character jump.
I wouldn't lower Rage level, personally. I'd lower something that'll actually make them more useful and less terrible early game.
Such as TDB, or CrossHalfMoon. Giving them Rage imo is a bad idea, won't accomplish much.
Or better yet, make slaying an actual decent spell? In every single server I've ever played it's taken only for the accuracy bonus, and if you could afford not taking it, you would because it interrupts TDB.
Make slaying do some seriously high damage, that'll help their early game big time and may even be useful when it cancels a TDB hit lol.
Such as TDB, or CrossHalfMoon. Giving them Rage imo is a bad idea, won't accomplish much.
Or better yet, make slaying an actual decent spell? In every single server I've ever played it's taken only for the accuracy bonus, and if you could afford not taking it, you would because it interrupts TDB.
Make slaying do some seriously high damage, that'll help their early game big time and may even be useful when it cancels a TDB hit lol.
- Jun 8, 2012
- 1,041
- 41
- 135
I agree with slaying to do high dmg but only in PvE. Cba having a random passive FS in pvp lol
Also like the slaying idea, you could also make it gain some special effect when TDB yellow effect is active somehow? For example make slaying hit for 3x more damage when the TDB yellow effect is active? Would make spell also appealing at high level knowing that if it procs after TDB effect you can do some serious damage.
You also have to be careful what you move where.
From what I can see from playing Closed Beta is that the only reason to keep playing the same old content over and over is items/spells.
If you make it easier to get most of the spells, they only thing left to do is hunt items and fight.
From what I can see from playing Closed Beta is that the only reason to keep playing the same old content over and over is items/spells.
If you make it easier to get most of the spells, they only thing left to do is hunt items and fight.
how about instead of taking this polls results you give a warrior that is not yet level 30 rage and let them play with it for a bit and see how they rate it?
tbh though i always found they (rage, profield) had to short a cooldown so i ended up using them alot less than i should.
tbh though i always found they (rage, profield) had to short a cooldown so i ended up using them alot less than i should.
Personally I would like to see Warriors gain a bit of loving lol, they do get left out a lot.
I'd be playing a different class so i'm prob shooting myself in the foot, but i'd say Lv.22 would be better...New skill as they get new armour :P
I'd be playing a different class so i'm prob shooting myself in the foot, but i'd say Lv.22 would be better...New skill as they get new armour :P